Idiom Insider The origins, properly sourced
idiominsider.com How we source & date Folk etymologies corrected Established 2026
DOMESTIC · 1611 Attested

burning the candle at both ends

To exhaust yourself by doing too much, especially by staying up late and rising early, or by pushing your energy and resources beyond what can last.

“She was holding down a day job, studying for the bar at night, and training for a marathon before dawn - burning the candle at both ends until she finally collapsed with exhaustion.”

First recorded 1611 · Randle Cotgrave, A Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues (London, 1611) ↓
❖
First recorded
1611
Randle Cotgrave, A Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues (London, 1611)
“Brusler la chandelle par les deux bouts. To burne the candle at both ends.”
The phrase is first recorded in English in Cotgrave's 1611 French-English dictionary, as a gloss on the French 'brusler la chandelle par les deux bouts'. There it meant wasteful extravagance - squandering wealth and resources - because candles were costly and lighting both ends used one up twice as fast. Nathan Bailey's Dictionarium Britannicum (1730) kept this money sense, glossing it of a spendthrift husband and wife. The modern 'exhausting yourself with overwork / late nights and early mornings' sense developed later, as the image was reread from wasted wax to wasted energy. Edna St Vincent Millay's 1920 poem 'First Fig' popularised the vivid modern image but did not originate the phrase, which predates her by more than three centuries.

The popular story

Ask most people where ‘burning the candle at both ends’ comes from and you will hear one of two answers. The first is that it was coined by the American poet Edna St Vincent Millay, whose 1920 poem ‘First Fig’ opens with the unforgettable line ‘My candle burns at both ends’. The second is vaguer: that it simply describes the modern condition of working too hard, staying up too late, and rising too early, as if the phrase were born in an age of commuters and deadlines. Both stories feel right. Both are, at best, half-true.

The appeal of the Millay story is obvious. Her quatrain is so compact and so quotable that it reads like the moment a phrase was struck into being. And the overwork meaning is the only one most living speakers have ever used. It is easy to assume that the words and the meaning arrived together, fully formed, in the twentieth century.

What the record shows

The documentary record tells a longer and more interesting story. The earliest known appearance in English is more than three centuries before Millay, in Randle Cotgrave’s A Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues, printed in London in 1611. Cotgrave was not describing overwork. He was translating a French idiom, ‘brusler la chandelle par les deux bouts’ – to burn the candle at both ends – and the sense he recorded was wasteful extravagance, the reckless squandering of wealth.

The logic was literal and domestic. Candles were expensive household goods, and a tallow or wax candle lit at one end lasted a known time. Light it at both ends at once – tip it sideways so both wick and base flame together – and you consumed it twice as fast for no gain. It was the perfect everyday emblem of throwing money away. More than a century later, Nathan Bailey’s Dictionarium Britannicum of 1730 still carried this financial meaning, glossing the saying as something said when husband and wife are both spendthrifts. The ‘both ends’, in that reading, were the two people in a marriage, each burning through the family purse.

So for its first two hundred years in English, the phrase was about money, not sleep. The shift to the modern meaning – exhausting yourself by doing too much, burning your own energy and health from both sides – came later, as speakers reread the same image. The wasted substance was no longer wax or coin but vitality. By the time Millay wrote in 1920, the overwork-and-intensity sense was available to her, and her poem gave it its most famous expression. She popularised the image brilliantly; she did not invent the phrase.

The verdict

This one is genuinely attested, and pleasingly so. We have a dated, printed first record – Cotgrave, 1611 – a clear French source, and a documented original meaning that is quite different from today’s. We can even watch the sense drift across later dictionaries. The common claims attached to the phrase mostly survive scrutiny, with one correction: Millay was a populariser, not an originator. Verdict: attested.

What we don’t know

What we cannot pin down precisely is the moment the meaning turned. The money sense and the energy sense overlap for a long stretch, and idioms rarely change on a single datable day. We also do not know exactly how old the French expression was before Cotgrave captured it in 1611; a dictionary records usage that already exists, so the living phrase may be older still, with its earliest spoken life now lost. And while 1611 is the best-supported first record, some popular sources muddle the dates, variously placing the ‘coining’ in the seventeenth or eighteenth century. The safest honest claim is that the phrase is at least as old as 1611 and that its modern meaning is a later re-reading of an older one.

How it’s used today

In current English the idiom is almost always about over-extension: taking on more than your reserves of time, sleep, or energy can support. It carries a built-in warning – the candle that burns at both ends burns out faster – so it is used with a note of concern rather than praise. You might say a student is burning the candle at both ends during exam season, or warn a colleague against it before they collapse. The original flavour of wasted wealth has faded almost entirely, but the deep image is unchanged: something precious being spent twice as fast as it should, until there is nothing left to light.

Sources

  1. The Phrase Finder - Burn the candle at both ends
  2. Dictionary.com - burn the candle at both ends
  3. Grammarist - Burn the candle at both ends
  4. LitCharts - Edna St. Vincent Millay, 'First Fig'

Common questions

Where does 'burning the candle at both ends' come from?
It is first recorded in English in Randle Cotgrave's 1611 Dictionarie of the French and English Tongues, where it translates the French idiom 'brusler la chandelle par les deux bouts'. It entered English as a direct rendering of that French phrase.
Did it always mean overworking yourself?
No. Originally it meant wasteful extravagance - squandering money and resources. Candles were expensive, so lighting both ends was a vivid image of needless waste. Nathan Bailey's 1730 dictionary still used it of spendthrift husbands and wives. The 'exhausting yourself with overwork' sense came later.
Did Edna St Vincent Millay invent the phrase?
No. Her 1920 poem 'First Fig' ('My candle burns at both ends') made the modern image famous, but the phrase was already more than three hundred years old by then. She popularised it; she did not originate it.
Why a candle specifically?
Because candles were costly household goods, burning one from both ends at once used it up twice as fast for no benefit - a everyday symbol of waste. When the idiom shifted to overwork, the same image was reread as spending your own energy from both ends until nothing is left.
When did the meaning shift to overwork?
Gradually after the 18th century. The money sense dominated into the 1700s; the modern sense of over-extending yourself through late nights and early mornings became the everyday meaning later, and Millay's 1920 poem cemented it in popular imagination.

Last reviewed 2026-10 · How we source & date

Related phrases